<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>esotechnica &#187; WWW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/category/www/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous thoughts about Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Xmarks?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/09/goodbye-xmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/09/goodbye-xmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days ago, it seemed that XMarks was going to close, forever. It seems that they&#8217;ve had a load of comments saying &#8220;oh no, what do I do now &#8211; they&#8217;re the only cross browser sync in the business&#8221; (they don&#8217;t &#8211; sadly &#8211; support Opera, but do support Firefox, Internet Explorer, Chrome and Safari, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/09/goodbye-xmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweet new posts in WordPress&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/08/tweet-new-posts-in-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/08/tweet-new-posts-in-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long while not bothering to update WordPress, when I finally got around to installing version 3.1, which I had to do manually, as the automated updated didn&#8217;t work (it hasn&#8217;t worked in months). Immediately after running the (required) database update, I began getting 500 errors on the site. Not good. A little internet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/08/tweet-new-posts-in-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I write like&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/07/i-write-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/07/i-write-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Write Like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neat stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;William Shakespeare. Well, according to I Write Like&#8216;s analysis of my last post, anyway&#8230; I write likeWilliam Shakespeare I Write Like by Mémoires, Mac journal software. Analyze your writing! IWL is quite a nice little site. It analyses your text and compares to well-known writers, and then gives you a code to embed a badge, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/07/i-write-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A suggestion for Google&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/05/a-suggestion-for-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/05/a-suggestion-for-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 19:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just had an idea for Google.  So, naturally, I did a Google search on &#8220;How to I make a suggestion for Google?&#8221;.  The top page told me the answer &#8211; but it wasn&#8217;t on Google&#8217;s site!  Anyway, turns out that their]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/05/a-suggestion-for-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230;And we are back!</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/05/and-we-are-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/05/and-we-are-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whinges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm a complete idiot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My regular readers (all both of you) may have noticed that Esotechnica has been offline. I&#8217;m sure your curiosity has been insatiable, so why the outage? That&#8217;s easy. I messed it up. One control panel &#8211; many sites. Too much wine, one wrong click&#8230; Safe to say I won&#8217;t be doing that again!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/05/and-we-are-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video on demand</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/03/video-on-demand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/03/video-on-demand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blinkbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iplayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s4c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seesaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talktalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zippy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video on demand services seem to have sneaked up while I wasn&#8217;t looking and implanted themselves all over the web. First of all, there&#8217;s the disarmingly simple-looking Seesaw, a recent launch from the broadcast services company Arqiva (by &#8220;broadcast services&#8221;, I mean they own/run transmitters, digital radio multiplexes and so on). Seesaw perhaps doesn&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/03/video-on-demand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flock 2.5.6</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/03/flock-2-5-6-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/03/flock-2-5-6-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ixQuick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycroft Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t looked at Flock for a long time, so I thought it was time I did. If you&#8217;ve not heard about Flock before, it&#8217;s a social web browser, which means that it&#8217;s designed to integrate with all the social networking services such as Facebook, MySpace, bebo, Twitter, Digg and all the in-crowd. But it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/03/flock-2-5-6-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google launches a URL shortener&#8230;  goo.gl</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/goo-g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/goo-g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feedburner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goo.gl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web behemoth Google has launched its own URL shortening service &#8211; goo.gl.  So far, it&#8217;s intended for use for tweeting your blog through Feedburner.  It makes sense from a Google perspective, as it gives them more information for their store, and the likelihood is that they will also provide that information through Analytics, too, at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/goo-g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress upgrades &#8211; beware beware beware!</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/wordpress-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/wordpress-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My WordPress plugin auto-upgrade stopped working sometime around WordPress 2.7. Being of an indolent persuasion, I stopped bothering trying. Maybe it was the browser &#8211; but it didn&#8217;t work on either Firefox or Internet Explorer on Windows. And when it didn&#8217;t work after the upgrade to WordPress 2.8, I tried it on 64-bit Kubuntu. It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/wordpress-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s new Public DNS&#8230;  worth a look?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/google-public-dns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/google-public-dns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARPANet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Public DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Mockapetris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRI-NIC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google have launched a new service, called Google Public DNS. DNS, for those that don&#8217;t know, is the system that translates a domain name &#8211; such as www.esotechnica.co.uk &#8211; into the actual address that the computer connects to its services: such as retrieving a web page like this one, retrieving (or sending) your email, downloading [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/google-public-dns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Bing, seconds out&#8230;  Google comes out fighting?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/bing-bing-seconds-out-google-comes-out-fighting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/bing-bing-seconds-out-google-comes-out-fighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google seems to be countering the threats from News Corp&#8216;s Rupert Murdoch, and Microsoft&#8217;s Bing by evolution, rather than revolution. First of all there is the change to allowing five page views from a subscription site in 24 hours, rather than the previous &#8220;first click&#8221; principle (where the first click is free, you have to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/bing-bing-seconds-out-google-comes-out-fighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run IE 6, 7 and 8 on the same machine</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/08/run-ie-6-7-and-8-on-the-same-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/08/run-ie-6-7-and-8-on-the-same-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you ever do any web development, you&#8217;ll be acutely conscious of the fact that you need most versions of IE available to test on. Of course, a virtual machine (using Virtual PC, Virtual Box, VMWare or whatever) is one solution, but it would be nice to have everything available on the same machine. Sure, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/08/run-ie-6-7-and-8-on-the-same-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My fave Firefox add-ons &#124; XMarks</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/05/firefox-addon-xmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/05/firefox-addon-xmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xmarks, formerly known as Foxmarks, is a bookmark-based search engine, a bookmark replicator, a saved password replicator and even helps out at lambing time.  (Okay, I made that last bit up).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/05/firefox-addon-xmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webcomics &#8211; a waste of time?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/11/webcomics-a-waste-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/11/webcomics-a-waste-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Friendly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago I used to read lots of comics online, especially one of the earliest &#8211; Doctor Fun, which sadly stopped publishing in 2006.  You&#8217;ll need to be a bit of a science buff to get most of the jokes, but Records Your Neighbours Listen To or When Cats Try To Cook (which I used [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/11/webcomics-a-waste-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iron &#8211; privacy enhanced version of Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/09/iron-privacy-enhanced-version-of-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/09/iron-privacy-enhanced-version-of-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an open-source spinoff from Chrome already: it&#8217;s called Iron (the website is in German, but Incomplete News translated it). When you install Chrome, there&#8217;s a check box that says &#8220;report crash data and usage statistics to Google&#8221;. You don&#8217;t have to tick this, of course, but if you do, Chrome generates a unique ID [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/09/iron-privacy-enhanced-version-of-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

