<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>esotechnica &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous thoughts about Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why isn&#8217;t there a Spotify for TV?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/10/why-isnt-there-a-spotify-for-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/10/why-isnt-there-a-spotify-for-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why isn&#8217;t there a Spotify for television? I don&#8217;t necessarily mean from Spotify themselves, but why is nobody actually doing it? Before you scream the house down – Hulu! Seesaw! YouTube! MSN Video! iTunes! &#8211; they&#8217;re not the same. Not the same at all. Let me explain&#8230; What makes Spotify unique is not so much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2010/10/why-isnt-there-a-spotify-for-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And I wondered if you&#8217;d love me then dear, just as you do today?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/ernest-pike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/ernest-pike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Ernie, we do. Some wonderful person has updated Ernest&#8217;s Wikipedia page with the sort of information that makes people like me cry, basically. But what really made me purr was seeing that the link marked &#8220;listen on line&#8221; pointed here. To esotechnica. The end of the page says: Perhaps it can be seen as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/ernest-pike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2007 doesn&#8217;t work on Windows Server 2008 R2?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/exchange-2007-doesnt-work-on-windows-server-2008-r2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/exchange-2007-doesnt-work-on-windows-server-2008-r2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citadel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bit of an oddity, this. I spotted on All About Microsoft (written by Mary Jo Foley, who&#8217;s been covering the company long enough to know more about them than most MS executives, I should imagine) that Exchange Server 2007 doesn&#8217;t work on Windows Server 2008 release 2. The question is: why doesn&#8217;t it? Not that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/12/exchange-2007-doesnt-work-on-windows-server-2008-r2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 things Windows ought to blatantly steal</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/10/5things-windows-ought-to-blatantly-steal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/10/5things-windows-ought-to-blatantly-steal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2007 I talked about 10 things I do and don&#8217;t like about Windows Vista. So here are 5 things Windows doesn&#8217;t have that it ought to blatantly copy for Windows 8&#8230; Unified file system No, I don&#8217;t mean the Unix file system idea, where there is a single file system from a single root. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/10/5things-windows-ought-to-blatantly-steal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ve still been in computers too long&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/06/youve-still-been-in-computers-too-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/06/youve-still-been-in-computers-too-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;when these mean something to you (response to this&#8230;) You&#8217;ve been in computers too long when&#8230; &#8230;the word &#8220;atom&#8221; makes you think &#8220;Intel&#8221; &#8230;&#8221;double glazed&#8221; makes you think for about thirty seconds &#8230;you understood the previous joke &#8230;you&#8217;ve spotted a logical inconsistency in Doesotevsky&#8217;s &#8220;Crime And Punishment&#8221; &#8230;or on the other hand, you&#8217;ve never read [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/06/youve-still-been-in-computers-too-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too clever?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/06/too-clever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/06/too-clever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid Or not clever enough? If you answer that question, you lose your own Buddha nature. Or maybe you don&#8217;t.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/06/too-clever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why DID Microsoft want to buy Yahoo!?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/10/why-ms-wanted-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/10/why-ms-wanted-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been thinking about the abortive Microsoft-Yahoo! deal last night in bed, and what came to me has been crystallising in my head ever since. Basically, Microsoft&#8216;s plan is, and always has been, to provide as much of the software for as many of the computers in the world as they can. Doesn&#8217;t sound too [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/10/why-ms-wanted-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Thursday O/S: 4.4BSD-Lite</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/07/the-thursday-os-44bsd-lite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/07/the-thursday-os-44bsd-lite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4.4BSD-Lite Licence:BSD Status:historic Version:4.4r2 (1995) Given Linus Torvalds&#8216; recent quote that the OpenBSD team&#8217;s approach to security made them look like a gang of masturbating monkeys, I thought it might be a good time to start up an idea I&#8217;ve been considering for a while: operating system of the week. BSD, in case you don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/07/the-thursday-os-44bsd-lite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

