<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>esotechnica &#187; Emulation and Virtualisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/category/emul8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous thoughts about Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Installing OS/2 Warp in a Virtual Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2011/04/installing-os2-warp-in-a-virtual-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2011/04/installing-os2-warp-in-a-virtual-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had OS/2 running in a virtual machine for years; specifically, a Virtual PC one. But I&#8217;ve always known that OS/2 has idiosyncracies, such that it won&#8217;t run in VMWare (although it&#8217;s getting better in VirtualBox). By change I stumbled on the excellent site OS/2 Museum. The whole site is fascinating, and if you&#8217;re interested [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2011/04/installing-os2-warp-in-a-virtual-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Error Reporting &#8211; FAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/04/windows-error-reporting-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/04/windows-error-reporting-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spyware Doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Error Reporting is all well and good, and I&#8217;m sure there are many problems that it&#8217;s solved. However it managed a classic fail tonight that made me chuckle. Take this error report here: &#8220;Update Spyware Doctor&#8221;. Fine. Sounds like a good idea. Such a good idea that&#8230;. it is in fact what I was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/04/windows-error-reporting-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacOS 7.5.5 on Basilisk ][</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/04/macos-755-on-basilisk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/04/macos-755-on-basilisk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just browsing through the links on here, thinking about checking whether they all still work I decided to have a go with Basilisk ][. The e-Maculation guide to setting up MacOS 7.5.5 in Basilisk ][ is fairly easy(ish) to follow (don't forget SDL and GTK which are on that page!). If you've any Windows or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2009/04/macos-755-on-basilisk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think inside the bochs</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/08/think-inside-the-bochs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/08/think-inside-the-bochs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dungeon Keeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally started by Kevin Lawton, the bochs project &#8211; whose motto is &#8220;Think inside the bochs&#8221; &#8211; maintains the bochs emulator. Bochs aims to emulate &#8211; at a reasonable speed and with a fair degree of accuracy &#8211; an x86-based 32-bit PC with the AMD 64-bit extensions. It can run most operating systems inside it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2008/08/think-inside-the-bochs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QEMU</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/12/qemu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/12/qemu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dungeon Keeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KQEMU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QEMU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 98]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esotechnica.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/qemu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fabrice Bellard&#8217;s excellent QEMU is up to version 0.9.0 (a Windows port is in alpha stage). So far, QEMU is the first thing I&#8217;ve found that runs Windows 98 and Dungeon Keeper properly.  Virtual PC was fast but couldn&#8217;t run anything other than the DOS version, and had problems with screen refresh.  Bochs was slow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/12/qemu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Useful resources</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/12/useful-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/12/useful-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BeOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DR-DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eComStation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeDOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiku OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenDOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS/2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReactOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeta OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esotechnica.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/useful-resources/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s always nice, when using a new operating system in a virtual machine, to have some apps to look at in it.  So I thought I&#8217;d compile a list of some, where to get them, and the usual suspects: OpenOffice.org, Firefox, Thunderbird and Opera.  Here, then, after a quick scan through my bookmarks is all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/12/useful-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QNX 6 on Virtual PC</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/qnx-6-on-virtual-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/qnx-6-on-virtual-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Momentics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esotechnica.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/qnx-6-on-virtual-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And here we have QNX 6 running on MS Virtual PC 2007&#8230; As you can see (if you click on the image, have a magnifying glass handy, are just generally psychic or have just read the last paragraph), this is a shot of QNX 6.3.2 running on&#8230;  well, anyway it works fine with or without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/qnx-6-on-virtual-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I can has QNX?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/i-can-has-qnx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/i-can-has-qnx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualBox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esotechnica.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/i-can-has-qnx/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently got my registration code back for ElcomSoft&#8216;s excellent Advanced Disk Catalog (I&#8217;ve been using it since Vladimir Katalov himself was in charge of it) and decided to rebuild my catalogues, which I haven&#8217;t had around since a hard disk corruption two or three years ago. While doing so, I came across an old [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/i-can-has-qnx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java or .Net?</title>
		<link>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/java-or-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/java-or-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Collis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emulation and Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esotechnica.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/java-or-net/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is either of them irrelevant to this blog? .Net looks irrelevant, Java doesn&#8217;t. Before you think I&#8217;m an anti-Microsoft stormtrooper, I&#8217;d like to explain why. Java works by using bytecode. It&#8217;s interpreted (or, more likely, converted into native machine code by the Java Runtime Environment) as being machine code targeted to a specific design of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esotechnica.co.uk/2007/11/java-or-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

